New

Home / New

Coal-based granular activated carbon: cost-effective choice in the water treatment industry – parameter analysis and practical cases

16 Jun , 2025
Coal-based granular activated carbon has become the main force in industrial water treatment due to its high adsorption, low cost and large-scale supply capacity. This article focuses on the parameters and unique advantages that customers are most concerned about to help you make scientific selections.

Get Free Quote

1. Core parameters that customers must read  
Parameters Industry standards Impact on water treatment
Iodine adsorption value ≥900 mg/g Determines the removal rate of small molecule organic matter (phenol, antibiotics)
Methylene blue adsorption value ≥120 mg/g Affects the decolorization ability of pigments and macromolecular colloids
Particle size 8-30 mesh (mainstream) Balance adsorption efficiency and pressure drop (optimal flow rate 10-15m/h)
Bulk density 0.45-0.55 g/cm³ Related filling volume, affecting equipment size design
Abrasion strength ≥95% Reduce backwash loss and extend service life
Ash content ≤8% (drinking water grade ≤3%) Avoid the risk of heavy metal (Pb/As) dissolution
II. Five unique advantages of coal-based carbon Cost reduction Unit price ¥5,000-7,000/ton (coconut shell carbon ¥12,000+), 40% reduction in water treatment cost per ton Case: A 100,000 tons/day water plant switched to coal-based carbon, saving ¥3.8 million in material costs per year Strong acid tolerance pH 2-10 stable operation (the adsorption rate of coconut shell charcoal drops by 20% when pH <4) Particularly suitable for electroplating wastewater (pH ≈ 3) and pickling wastewater treatment Regeneration advantage The thermal regeneration tolerance is better than wood charcoal, and it can be recycled 5-8 times (loss rate <10%) A chemical park measured: the iodine value retention rate of regenerated carbon is >85% Anti-biological contamination Surface hydrophobicity inhibits the growth of bacterial film, and the backwashing frequency is reduced by 50% Comparative experiment: coal-based carbon filter tank runs for 6 months without clogging, and fruit shell charcoal needs monthly chemical cleaning Customization flexibility Adjustable pore size: micropores (<2nm) adsorb pesticides/antibiotics, and mesopores (2-50nm) capture humic acid Case: Customized 1.5- 3nm pore carbon, COD removal rate increased to 92% III. Actual combat cases – data speaks Case 1: Deep treatment of municipal drinking water Background: A water plant in the north, the raw water is polluted by agriculture (atrazine pesticide residue 0.1mg/L) Solution: Coal-based granular carbon (iodine value 950mg/g, particle size 12-30 mesh) Filtration rate 12m/h, contact time 15 minutes Results: Effluent atrazine <0.001mg/L (national standard limit 0.002mg/L) The cost per ton of water is only ¥0.06, which saves 35% compared with the coconut shell carbon solution Case 2: Decolorization of printing and dyeing wastewater Background: Zhejiang Textile Factory, wastewater color 500 times (dilution multiple), COD 800mg/L Solution: High methylene blue value coal-based carbon (180mg/g) + ozone catalysis (O₃/C=3:1) Results: Color dropped to 10 times, COD<80mg/L Activated carbon consumption 1.2kg/ton of water, cost is only 1/5 of resin adsorption method
Mail to Us Get Free Sample Whatsapp for Price
'